By Christopher Lord (auth.)
Read or Download A Democratic Audit of the European Union PDF
Similar diplomacy books
It possesses nuclear guns and missiles to bring them, and regardless of a few development, it's not at all transparent that the continued six-party talks can be capable of exhibit the complete quantity of the rustic s nuclear actions, less convince Pyongyang to offer them up. the us keeps tens of hundreds of thousands of forces at the Korean peninsula in help of its commitments to the Republic of Korea (South Korea), a rustic with which the North continues to be technically at struggle.
This e-book is the 1st systemic research of the altering place of the ecu Union because it received a criminal character during the Treaty of Lisbon and determined to set up the ecu exterior motion carrier. the problem is whether or not those helpful institutional advancements will result in an upgrading of the EU's presence within the multilateral process of agencies and conventions of foreign legislations.
Worldwide crime governance has emerged as an immense section of international politics. it's manifested in nationwide and overseas agendas, the proliferation of worldwide laws, transforming into overseas budgets, and the enlarged mandates of overseas corporations. accordingly, the definition and prosecution of crime is now more and more homogenous, however it additionally indicates variance: a few crime regulations are institutionalized coherently or hooked up to robust overseas enterprises, whereas others are susceptible or dispersed throughout diverse boards.
- Reconstituting the Global Liberal Order Legitimacy and Regulation (Routledge Advances in International Relations and Global Politics)
- The United Nations Security Council and War: The Evolution of Thought and Practice since 1945
- America's Challenge: Engaging a Rising China in the Twenty-First Century
- Economic Sanctions and Presidential Decisions: Models of Political Rationality
Additional info for A Democratic Audit of the European Union
Many contributors to the literature have seen consociational democracy as suited to the EU (Chryssochoou, 1994; Lijphart, 1997). In other words, the Union would be democratic in so far as its institutions meet the following tests: (1) Provide inclusive and proportional representation of office-holders designated by national democracies; (2) Respect the autonomy of national democratic practices; (3) Allow representatives of national democracies to retain veto rights in matters they consider of vital importance (Lijphart, 1979, 1997).
45–6) Trust (p. 48) Rights (p. 51) Citizens’ knowledge and understanding of the EU (pp. 55–6) Voter participation (p. 65) Proportionality of national representation (p. 100) Representatives’ role conceptions (p. 127). A second reality check is provided by case studies of particular Union procedures. In many areas (such as Co-decision or Comitology) the existing literature provides an abundance of case studies. This research however develops some original case study material in relation to procedures that are recent or comparatively less well researched, including the Nice IGC (2000), the Conventions on the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (1999–2000) and on the Future of Europe (2001–), the Investitures of the Santer (1994–5) and Prodi Commissions (1999) and, indeed, the resignation of the former (1999).
Although its law takes priority over national law, there is no power of the Union that cannot itself be withdrawn by the agreement of Member States to change the Treaties. Furthermore, that power is dispersed and reliant on the enforcement structures of others, primarily the administrations of the Member States. As Joe Weiler puts it (2002, p. 568) the EU has a ‘top-to-bottom hierarchy of norms’ but a ‘bottom-to-top hierarchy of authority and real power’. All of this creates a dilemma. A pattern in which mechanisms of public control are dispersed horizontally across particular institutions of the Union and vertically across levels of Union governance will make it hard to apply democracy to the EU through one straightforward process of competition for political power.